A unique initiative called “Olive Branch” from GGPoker. Global unban

The "Olive Branch" became a rare gesture in a market where major platforms usually keep a strict distance from controversial situations. GGPoker decided to do what other rooms have avoided for years — opening a path for returns.

This is a signal that the room is ready to review old cases, realign community relations, and show that its fair play policy can be strict but not blind. If you want to follow such initiatives and news about poker trends, you can find up-to-date reviews in the blog.

"Olive Branch" is an official program from GGPoker that offers the possibility to apply for a review of early account blockings. The format is as straightforward as possible, with no automatic unbans or hidden conditions. Each case is considered manually.

Who the initiative concerns:

✔️ Players who were blocked for rule violations;

✔️ Users with limited functionality (e.g., withdrawal restrictions);

✔️ Those who were subject to sanctions under the fair play policy;

✔️ Participants whose cases are pending due to incomplete verification.

The amnesty does not guarantee an unban but gives the opportunity to explain the situation anew, within the framework of GG's updated security policy.

GGPoker takes a step rarely seen in the industry:

✓ Acknowledges that early blockings may have been too harsh;

✓ Shows readiness to act not only "by protocol" but also with human logic;

✓ Tries to restore trust.

In a system where the question "Why was I banned?" often remains unanswered, the room signals: we are ready to talk, not just make top-down decisions.

When a company of GGPoker's level launches amnesty, it is never a simple gesture. Such a decision has a strategic plan — and it is quite transparent when viewed by a regular player.

☑️ Building trust. GG has a huge audience and many controversial cases. The possibility of review is a way to show maturity and openness.

☑️ The room is preparing for further regulation. GG expands into licensed regions. The stricter the regulator, the more important transparency becomes.

The "Olive Branch" initiative fits perfectly into the company's model. Closed accounts lead to the departure of unhappy players, community noise, and unnecessary toxicity around the brand. The fewer unresolved stories, the cleaner the information environment.

Competition has intensified, and the room does not want to lose players

PokerStars bets on stability, WPN actively moves toward the USA, Asian clubs continue to gather recreational players. Opening the door back is a way to bring back some players who left involuntarily.

In poker, the relationship with participants is not only about rakeback, tournaments, and promotions. The "Olive Branch" is a rare example when a large room comes forward, guaranteeing clear communication and understandable rules.

GGPoker keeps the process simple. Everything is done via an official form.

Deadline — October 1, 2025. Applications must be sent strictly to the security service email. The subject must include "Olive Branch".

A data package required from each applicant is then collected:

✔️ GG login;

✔️ Full name;

✔️ Reasoned explanation of the blocking;

✔️ Copy of passport or driver’s license;

✔️ Photo holding the document.

Any illegible or blurred scan = instant refusal. The room is strict here.

GG does not disclose what violations qualify for amnesty — decisions are made by a separate commission. Answers will be sent by November 1, 2025.

But there are categories with no chance at all:

✔️ Use of HUDs, bots, tracking software;

✔️ Multi accounts;

✔️ Money laundering and any fraud schemes;

✔️ Intentional collusion and chip dumping.

GG returns experienced players, revives mid and high stakes, and simultaneously demonstrates readiness to give a second chance — unlike rooms where bans are usually final without appeals.

"Olive Branch" is a big step but not the final one. For rooms, such initiatives are always experiments — testing player reaction, internal processes, and attempts to build a new interaction format. So it’s important to understand what can really change next and what will stay the same:

☑️ Update of fair play policy. GG clearly tests new mechanics. Expect more careful bans, more manual checks. The system will remain strict but become more accurate.

☑️ Dialogues between the room and the community. Amnesty itself is a step forward. Official explanations will likely appear, and representatives will more often explain their position.

☑️ Possibility that the industry adopts the idea. If the initiative works, other rooms might launch their amnesty versions or at least review old cases.

"Olive Branch" is the beginning of an approach change. GGPoker remains strict but becomes more predictable and closer to players. The industry gets an example once considered impossible.